Search alternatives:
significantly used » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly faster (Expand Search), significantly linked (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
used decreased » use decreased (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly used » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly faster (Expand Search), significantly linked (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
used decreased » use decreased (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
Osteoporosis screening among study participants.
Published 2024“…Frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the characteristics of participants. …”
-
64
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…Frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the characteristics of participants. …”
-
65
Practices towards the prevention of osteoporosis.
Published 2024“…Frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the characteristics of participants. …”
-
66
Source of healthcare information.
Published 2024“…Frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the characteristics of participants. …”
-
67
Individual characteristics of the participants.
Published 2024“…Frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the characteristics of participants. …”
-
68
-
69
-
70
Results of the LMM analysis for IOP change.
Published 2025“…The mean GMS was 2.46 ± 1.33 preoperatively, and decreased to 1.32 ± 1.31 at 3 months, and 1.60 ± 1.41 at 12 months postoperatively. …”
-
71
Results of the LMM analysis for GMS change.
Published 2025“…The mean GMS was 2.46 ± 1.33 preoperatively, and decreased to 1.32 ± 1.31 at 3 months, and 1.60 ± 1.41 at 12 months postoperatively. …”
-
72
-
73
LM test of spatial panel model.
Published 2024“…We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ozone driving factors using the GTWR. The results show that: i) The average annual increase of ozone concentration in ambient air in China from 2015 to 2019 was 1.68<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup>, and 8.39<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup> elevated the year 2019 compared with 2015. ii) The Moran’s I value of ozone in ambient air was 0.027 in 2015 and 0.209 in 2019, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of "east heavy and west light" and "south low and north high". iii) Per capita GDP industrial structure, population density, land expansion, and urbanization rate have significant spillover effects on ozone concentration, and the regional spillover effect is greater than the local effect. …”
-
74
Descriptive statistics (2015–2019).
Published 2024“…We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ozone driving factors using the GTWR. The results show that: i) The average annual increase of ozone concentration in ambient air in China from 2015 to 2019 was 1.68<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup>, and 8.39<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup> elevated the year 2019 compared with 2015. ii) The Moran’s I value of ozone in ambient air was 0.027 in 2015 and 0.209 in 2019, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of "east heavy and west light" and "south low and north high". iii) Per capita GDP industrial structure, population density, land expansion, and urbanization rate have significant spillover effects on ozone concentration, and the regional spillover effect is greater than the local effect. …”
-
75
Spatial error model under nested matrix.
Published 2024“…We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ozone driving factors using the GTWR. The results show that: i) The average annual increase of ozone concentration in ambient air in China from 2015 to 2019 was 1.68<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup>, and 8.39<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup> elevated the year 2019 compared with 2015. ii) The Moran’s I value of ozone in ambient air was 0.027 in 2015 and 0.209 in 2019, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of "east heavy and west light" and "south low and north high". iii) Per capita GDP industrial structure, population density, land expansion, and urbanization rate have significant spillover effects on ozone concentration, and the regional spillover effect is greater than the local effect. …”
-
76
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ozone driving factors using the GTWR. The results show that: i) The average annual increase of ozone concentration in ambient air in China from 2015 to 2019 was 1.68<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup>, and 8.39<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup> elevated the year 2019 compared with 2015. ii) The Moran’s I value of ozone in ambient air was 0.027 in 2015 and 0.209 in 2019, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of "east heavy and west light" and "south low and north high". iii) Per capita GDP industrial structure, population density, land expansion, and urbanization rate have significant spillover effects on ozone concentration, and the regional spillover effect is greater than the local effect. …”
-
77
Flow chart of urbanization ozone pollution.
Published 2024“…We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ozone driving factors using the GTWR. The results show that: i) The average annual increase of ozone concentration in ambient air in China from 2015 to 2019 was 1.68<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup>, and 8.39<i>μg/m</i><sup><i>3</i></sup> elevated the year 2019 compared with 2015. ii) The Moran’s I value of ozone in ambient air was 0.027 in 2015 and 0.209 in 2019, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of "east heavy and west light" and "south low and north high". iii) Per capita GDP industrial structure, population density, land expansion, and urbanization rate have significant spillover effects on ozone concentration, and the regional spillover effect is greater than the local effect. …”
-
78
-
79
-
80
S1 File -
Published 2023“…Further, despite the implementation of the fatiguing RSA protocol, over the course of the three time-points, participants seemed to perform the two jump tasks more efficiently, seen through significantly lower contraction times, greater eccentric (ECC) peak power, and greater ECC mean deceleration force within the CMJ following the RSA task. …”