Showing 41 - 56 results of 56 for search '(( significantly ((mean decrease) OR (greatest decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))~', query time: 0.38s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43
  4. 44
  5. 45
  6. 46

    DataSheet1_The development of patient-specific 3D anatomical models in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.docx by Zahra J. Haq (20411501)

    Published 2024
    “…Mental demand showed the greatest decrease in mean workload out of all the 6 subscales tested for in the NASA TLX (210.3 vs 136.7) points. …”
  7. 47

    Upper extremity orthopedic softball injuries presenting to the emergency department: epidemiology across the lifespan by David F. Painter (12884672)

    Published 2024
    “…The average incidence rate of UE injuries from 2012–2021 was 187.9 per 100,000 persons, with a significant decrease in injury incidence across the timespan (<i>p</i> < .001). …”
  8. 48

    Data Sheet 1_Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic agents for post-transplant diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis.docx by Shanbiao Hu (15063765)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to placebo, insulin produced the greatest reductions in HbA1c (mean difference [MD] − 0.35, 95% CI − 0.90 to 0.20) and FPG (MD − 9.06 mmol/L, 95% CI − 18.66 to 0.53). …”
  9. 49

    Data Sheet 1_Does chlorhexidine improve periodontal health and bacterial profiles in patients with special health care needs? A systematic review and meta-analysis.docx by Deepak Sharma (131639)

    Published 2025
    “…Gingival inflammation also decreased significantly across studies (mean difference = −0.214; 95% CI: −0.306 to −0.121; P < .001), with 0.2% CHX formulations demonstrating the most consistent improvement.…”
  10. 50

    Personality traits in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Omid Mirmosayyeb (12431770)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, Neuroticism showed the most significant pooled correlations with mood and fatigue, while Conscientiousness demonstrated the greatest pooled correlations with disability and cognitive performance in PwMS. …”
  11. 51

    S1 Data - by Yumeng Zhang (3115050)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of this study suggest that the level of well-being as a whole, as well as in the eastern, central and western regions increased significantly over the period, with an “east-to-west decreasing” distribution in China. …”
  12. 52

    Index system for well-being level. by Yumeng Zhang (3115050)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of this study suggest that the level of well-being as a whole, as well as in the eastern, central and western regions increased significantly over the period, with an “east-to-west decreasing” distribution in China. …”
  13. 53

    Table 1_Impact of leukemia subtype and demographics on patient quality of life in 76 countries: a cross-sectional study.docx by Sam Salek (5800727)

    Published 2025
    “…HM-PRO scores differed significantly between leukemia subtypes (p<0.001); patients with ALL reported the worst outcomes. …”
  14. 54

    Data Sheet 1_Impact of leukemia subtype and demographics on patient quality of life in 76 countries: a cross-sectional study.pdf by Sam Salek (5800727)

    Published 2025
    “…HM-PRO scores differed significantly between leukemia subtypes (p<0.001); patients with ALL reported the worst outcomes. …”
  15. 55

    Data Sheet 2_Impact of leukemia subtype and demographics on patient quality of life in 76 countries: a cross-sectional study.docx by Sam Salek (5800727)

    Published 2025
    “…HM-PRO scores differed significantly between leukemia subtypes (p<0.001); patients with ALL reported the worst outcomes. …”
  16. 56

    Data Sheet 1_Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis in the extreme elderly (≥80 years): a multicenter retrospective real-world study.pdf by Ye Hong (2580841)

    Published 2025
    “…At week 4 (1week after the final infusion), the study showed significant reductions in all efficacy measurements: MG-ADL scores decreased by 52.2% ± 30.8% (from 10.9 ± 2.7 to 3.6 ± 2.1), QMG scores by 36.6% ± 28.4% (from 18.2 ± 7.0 to 11.7 ± 8.3), MGC scores by 48.2% ± 33.4% (from 17.8 ± 7.5 to 9.0 ± 8.6). …”