Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease observed » increases observed (Expand Search), case observed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease observed » increases observed (Expand Search), case observed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
Table_1_Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentrations 72 Hours Following Marathon Running.DOCX
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: Linear mixed-model analyses revealed a main effect of time for BDNF concentrations over the study period (F<sub>(4,89.389)</sub> = 4.296, p = 0.003). Values decreased significantly with the lowest values at 72 h after the marathon compared to baseline (p = 0.025), a finding that was more pronounced in the larger male cohort.…”
-
56
-
57
-
58
Increased osteoblastic activity and decreased osteoclastogenesis in TgLRAP cells <i>in vitro</i>.
Published 2021“…Compared with the co-culture of WT BMCs and WT calvarial cells (WT / WT), the number of osteoclasts were significantly decreased at 50% in the co-cultures of TgLRAP BMCs and TgLRAP calvarial cells (TgLRAP / TgLRAP) (graph). …”
-
59
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
60