Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 21 - 40 results of 32,491 for search '(( significantly ((mean decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease revealed ))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28

    B2 decreases glycolytic intermediates in cells. by Craig Eyster (392633)

    Published 2025
    “…Other abbreviations: HGA, DL-hydroxyglutaric acid; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; 3-PGA, 3-phosphoglyceric acid; G3P; glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; Data (n = 5) are shown as mean±SD. Not significant (ns): **<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01, ****<i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison of the mean of each test group to the mean of the vehicle control. …”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32

    Table_1_Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentrations 72 Hours Following Marathon Running.DOCX by Astrid Roeh (11136600)

    Published 2021
    “…Values decreased significantly with the lowest values at 72 h after the marathon compared to baseline (p = 0.025), a finding that was more pronounced in the larger male cohort.…”
  13. 33

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37

    Percent accuracy and mean reaction time across the TLDB task. by David Apreutesei (19429483)

    Published 2024
    Subjects: “…correlational analyses revealed…”
  18. 38

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  19. 39
  20. 40