Table 5_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 2_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 9_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 8_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 6_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 7_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Table 3_Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and host genes in regulating vibriosis resistance in Cynoglossus semilaevis.xlsx by Weiwei Zheng (140828)

“…</p>Results<p>Obvious histopathological differences were observed between the resistant and susceptible groups in terms of inflammatory cells infiltration, and tissue dissociation of mucosal layer. 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicated that Vibrio increased but Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium, Delftia, and Salinivibrio decreased in the susceptible group. Compared to the control group, 1,986 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the susceptible group, significantly more than the 310 DEGs found in the resistant group. …”

Image_3_Loss of Cdc42 causes abnormal optic cup morphogenesis and microphthalmia in mouse.JPEG by Katrina S. Hofstetter (17545425)

“…EdU incorporation is significantly downregulated. In addition, mitotic retinal progenitor cells mislocalize deeper, basal regions, likely contributing to decreased proliferation. …”

Image 2_Age-dependent effects of H2S on post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescent and adult mice.jpeg by Bing Gu (276393)

“…</p>Methods<p>The expression of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), one of the main enzymes for endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) production in the brain, is age-dependent. …”

Image 13_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image 12_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image 11_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image 2_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image 10_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image_2_Loss of Cdc42 causes abnormal optic cup morphogenesis and microphthalmia in mouse.jpg by Katrina S. Hofstetter (17545425)

“…EdU incorporation is significantly downregulated. In addition, mitotic retinal progenitor cells mislocalize deeper, basal regions, likely contributing to decreased proliferation. …”

Image 9_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image_2_Loss of Cdc42 causes abnormal optic cup morphogenesis and microphthalmia in mouse.jpg by Katrina S. Hofstetter (17545425)

“…EdU incorporation is significantly downregulated. In addition, mitotic retinal progenitor cells mislocalize deeper, basal regions, likely contributing to decreased proliferation. …”

Image 3_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”

Image_3_Loss of Cdc42 causes abnormal optic cup morphogenesis and microphthalmia in mouse.JPEG by Katrina S. Hofstetter (17545425)

“…EdU incorporation is significantly downregulated. In addition, mitotic retinal progenitor cells mislocalize deeper, basal regions, likely contributing to decreased proliferation. …”

Image 7_Integrative multiomics analysis reveals association of gut microbiota and its metabolites with susceptibility to keloids.jpeg by Dang Li (16400478)

“…<p>Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disease of the skin, which can significantly impact one’s quality of life through cosmetic concerns, physical discomfort (itchy; painful), restricted movement, and psychological distress. …”