Search alternatives:
significant proportion » significant reduction (Expand Search)
proportion decrease » proportional decrease (Expand Search), proportion increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant proportion » significant reduction (Expand Search)
proportion decrease » proportional decrease (Expand Search), proportion increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
2401
-
2402
-
2403
-
2404
-
2405
-
2406
-
2407
-
2408
-
2409
Histogram of the extracted parameters.
Published 2025“…No significant associations were found with long-term outcomes.…”
-
2410
-
2411
-
2412
-
2413
-
2414
-
2415
XRD diffraction pattern spectra of PFAgNPs.
Published 2025“…The no observed adverse effect level was 50 mg/kgBW, the lowest observed adverse effect level was 100 mg/kgBW, and median lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>) was 1000 mg/kg. The PFAgNPs significantly decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) serum proteins, cholesterol, estrogen and progesterone alongside preservation of the histoarchitecture of the uterus. …”
-
2416
Effect of DM, and/or <i>M. charantia</i> on the immuno-expressional level of NGF protein in maternal cerebellar tissue of different groups.
Published 2025“…Figs <b>(E & F):</b> Diabetic mothers have a significant decrease in the expression of NGF protein across all three layers of the cerebellar cortex. …”
-
2417
Summary of correlations in previous studies.
Published 2025“…The quantitative wastewater surveillance model offers a reliable means of estimating the number of infected individuals, which can be instrumental in informing policy decisions.…”
-
2418
The characteristics of nine WWTPs.
Published 2025“…The quantitative wastewater surveillance model offers a reliable means of estimating the number of infected individuals, which can be instrumental in informing policy decisions.…”
-
2419
Model parameters.
Published 2024“…In contrast, comparing with no hand washing, handwashing every 2 hours can reduce the infection risk per visit to the airport by only 2.0%, making public surface disinfection significantly more effective than handwashing. If the mask-wearing rate increases from 0% to 50%, the infection risk of norovirus would be decreased by 48.0% (95% CI, 43.5–52.3%). …”
-
2420