بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
point decrease » point increase (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
point decrease » point increase (توسيع البحث)
-
421
-
422
-
423
-
424
-
425
-
426
-
427
-
428
-
429
-
430
-
431
-
432
Amplitude for A/L = 0.29.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
433
Top view of the experimental setup.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
434
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
435
Parameters of energy harvesting.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
436
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
437
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
438
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
439
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"
-
440
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
منشور في 2025"…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …"