ERI Thresholds Between Adjacent Zones. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Location of the study area. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Random Forest structure with cross-validation. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Land use change from 1990 to 2020. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Geographic data. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Classification accuracy. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Characteristics of the included studies. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

Summary of results. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

Scatter plots of the linear regression for the relationship between the duration of the vegetative phase and the average mass of single inflorescences. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 5 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 4 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Bias risk assessments for each RCT study. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

The flow chart of studies selecting. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

Funnel plots for intraoperative blood loss. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

Bias risk assessments for each RCS study. by Xin Liu (43569)

Subjects:

Patient and family perceptions of signs and symptoms of acute deterioration (ordered by most to least frequently selected as “absolutely”). by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

Subjects:

Distribution of responses to vital signs. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

Subjects:

Survey tool development process. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

Subjects:

Scatterplot of observed barrier scores against knowledge scores (top) and confidence scores (bottom) with linear line of best fit. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

Subjects:

Local consumer escalation process (adapted from Local Health Network (CALHN) procedure 2019) [16]. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

Subjects: