بدائل البحث:
significant treatment » significant investment (توسيع البحث), significant enrichment (توسيع البحث), significant impairment (توسيع البحث)
treatment decrease » treatment decreased (توسيع البحث), treatments decreased (توسيع البحث), treatment increases (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant treatment » significant investment (توسيع البحث), significant enrichment (توسيع البحث), significant impairment (توسيع البحث)
treatment decrease » treatment decreased (توسيع البحث), treatments decreased (توسيع البحث), treatment increases (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
1
Study selection criteria.
منشور في 2025"…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…"
-
2
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
منشور في 2025"…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…"
-
3
PRISMA flow chart.
منشور في 2025"…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…"
-
4
Flowchart of patient selection in this study.
منشور في 2024"…Among the letrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index tended to decline during letrozole treatment; a significant decrease was observed at 18 and 24 months compared with the baseline values (p = 0.044 and p = 0.013). …"
-
5
S1 Data -
منشور في 2024"…Among the letrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index tended to decline during letrozole treatment; a significant decrease was observed at 18 and 24 months compared with the baseline values (p = 0.044 and p = 0.013). …"
-
6
-
7
Characteristics of the included studies.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
8
Summary of results.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
9
Bias risk assessments for each RCT study.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
10
The flow chart of studies selecting.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
11
Funnel plots for intraoperative blood loss.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
12
Bias risk assessments for each RCS study.
منشور في 2025"…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …"
-
13
Study-related adverse events.
منشور في 2025"…Safety was a study outcome and assessed by rate and severity of AEs and any incident suicidality or significant mental health symptoms. Baseline and outcome data were summarized using descriptive statistics, with continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations. …"
-
14
Study flow chart.
منشور في 2025"…Safety was a study outcome and assessed by rate and severity of AEs and any incident suicidality or significant mental health symptoms. Baseline and outcome data were summarized using descriptive statistics, with continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations. …"
-
15
Study CONSORT diagram.
منشور في 2025"…Safety was a study outcome and assessed by rate and severity of AEs and any incident suicidality or significant mental health symptoms. Baseline and outcome data were summarized using descriptive statistics, with continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations. …"
-
16
Characteristics of JIA patients.
منشور في 2025"…Following biologic therapy, growth delay decreased to 8% and impaired growth to 36.8%. Patients with systemic JIA showed lower changes in growth parameters compared to others, and no significant differences were observed between different biologic drugs. …"
-
17
List of excluded articles.
منشور في 2025"…Following biologic therapy, growth delay decreased to 8% and impaired growth to 36.8%. Patients with systemic JIA showed lower changes in growth parameters compared to others, and no significant differences were observed between different biologic drugs. …"
-
18
-
19
Characteristics of the included studies.
منشور في 2025"…The pooling of dichotomous outcome data was achieved using relative risk (RR), with results presented within a 95% confidence interval (CI). We utilized the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. …"
-
20
Extracted data and used for analysis.
منشور في 2025"…The pooling of dichotomous outcome data was achieved using relative risk (RR), with results presented within a 95% confidence interval (CI). We utilized the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. …"