Search alternatives:
significantly impairs » significantly impacts (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly improves (Expand Search)
mediate decrease » mediated defense (Expand Search)
significantly impairs » significantly impacts (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly improves (Expand Search)
mediate decrease » mediated defense (Expand Search)
-
3021
-
3022
-
3023
-
3024
Data Sheet 1_Cross-species analysis of FcγRIIa/b (CD32a/b) polymorphisms at position 131: structural and functional insights into the mechanism of IgG- mediated phagocytosis in hum...
Published 2025“…Its affinity for IgG and ability to mediate ADCP is influenced by allelic polymorphisms. …”
-
3025
-
3026
-
3027
-
3028
-
3029
-
3030
-
3031
-
3032
-
3033
-
3034
-
3035
SPIRIT Schedule of Enrollment.
Published 2025“…Therefore, this study investigated the effects of a tailored aquatic exercise protocol on muscle activation and strength in visually impaired individuals.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Thirty women who were blind (mean age = 29.03 ± 2.20 years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (EX) group and a control (CO) group. …”
-
3036
Measuring muscle strength [49].
Published 2025“…Therefore, this study investigated the effects of a tailored aquatic exercise protocol on muscle activation and strength in visually impaired individuals.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Thirty women who were blind (mean age = 29.03 ± 2.20 years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (EX) group and a control (CO) group. …”
-
3037
Details of aquatic exercise protocol.
Published 2025“…Therefore, this study investigated the effects of a tailored aquatic exercise protocol on muscle activation and strength in visually impaired individuals.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Thirty women who were blind (mean age = 29.03 ± 2.20 years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (EX) group and a control (CO) group. …”
-
3038
-
3039
-
3040
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”