NN analysis to assign the importance of variables. by Sulmaz Ghahramani (3387635)

Screening Sheet: A sheet that contains the full screening process that we used to include or exclude any study. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Enrichment analysis of genes from the significant MS module. by Lai Jiang (2401513)

“…<p><b>(a)</b> Venn diagram showing the intersection of DEGs and significant module genes from WGCNA, resulting in 46 key intersection genes. …”

Summary map of all contacts with statistically significant SVM classifications. by Alexander P. Rockhill (6053618)

“…Yellow indicates an increase in time-frequency clusters during number trials versus inter-trial intervals while blue indicates a decrease in time-frequency clusters. White regions in the plot indicate that no directional change occurred. …”

Why does task performance decrease with burst length? by Swathi Anil (17382903)

Significant decrease of the viability of A375 melanoma cells after CD treatment. by Lena Berning (7430117)

Flowchart of literature screening process. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed a significant prevention of serious infections (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.25-0.64, p = 0.0001). …”

The intervention process. by Maji Hailemariam (736889)

“…<div><p>Background</p><p>Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem often associated with serious mental health and physical health implications. …”

Neural Network Enables High Accuracy for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Detection with a Plasmonic Platform by Weihong Sun (546823)

Subjects:

A proposed working model of how the GmNN1/FT2a-GmNYFA-C-GmENOD40 module regulates nodulation in soybean. by Xinxin Li (281237)

Subjects:

Literature search and screening process. by Xiaohong Mai (19338585)

“…Compared with controls, significantly moderate decrease in microbial richness in participants with sarcopenia were found (Chao1: SMD = -0.44; 95%CI, -0.64 to -0.23, <i>I</i>^<i>2</i> = 57.23%, 13 studies; observed species: SMD = -0.68; 95%CI, -1.00 to -0.37, <i>I</i>^<i>2</i> = 66.07%, 5 studies; ACE index: SMD = -0.30; 95%CI, -0.56 to -0.04, <i>I</i>^<i>2</i> = 8.12%, 4 studies), with very low certainty of evidence. …”

Average effect size decreased as sample size increased for all types of analyses (<i>p</i> < .001). by Luke J. Ney (12621627)

Subjects:

Pseudo code describing the process of generating an exhaustively optimal decision tree. by Simon Taub (12262035)

Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines. by Nazima Nasrullah (6874496)

“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”

Flow chart of the study process. by Wan-Jing Zhen (20427813)

“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study elucidated the interplay between metabolism and the immune microenvironment in SIC, providing fresh perspectives on the investigation of potential SIC pathogenesis. PDHB emerged as a significant biomarker of SIC, with implications on its progression through the regulation of ERS and metabolism.…”

Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and... by Robert Trybulski (10998702)

Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation by Xiaoyu Shen (4715430)

“…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …”

Computational parameters used in the simulations. by Yifei Li (198040)

“…A combination of bench and simulation tests validated the test results, showing no significant differences and confirming the method’s viability for determining COR. …”

The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”

Unedited gel image corresponding to S3A Fig of supporting information. by Fatema Calcuttawala (8399577)

Subjects: