Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Burn out assessment throughout demographic structure of the participant. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Demographic structure and Employment categorization. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Stack column chart represent Emotional Exhaustion through demographic structure. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Hardness increase across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Donut chart shows Demographic structure and Employment categorization. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

i & ii: PCA represent the (i) 2d and (ii) 3d to identify the underlying dimensions of the lifestyle questions. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Multiple linear regression analysis results. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Stack column chart represent Depersonalization through demographic structure. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects: