Search alternatives:
significantly preferred » significantly prevented (Expand Search), significantly predicted (Expand Search), significantly differed (Expand Search)
preferred decrease » reported decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,456 for search '(( significantly ((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly preferred decrease ))', query time: 0.72s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and heart rate (HR) across the three conditions.

    Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and... by Robert Trybulski (10998702)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Mean (SDs) of take-over reaction times according to scene complexity and type of autonomous driving information display.

    Mean (SDs) of take-over reaction times according to scene complexity and type of autonomous driving information display. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Mean (SD) of fixation duration, fixation counts, and SAGAT accuracy according to scene complexity and autonomous driving information display type.

    Mean (SD) of fixation duration, fixation counts, and SAGAT accuracy according to scene complexity and autonomous driving information display type. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    The mean and standard error of SAGAT accuracy for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities.

    The mean and standard error of SAGAT accuracy for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    The mean and standard error of fixation duration for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities.

    The mean and standard error of fixation duration for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    The mean and standard error of fixation counts for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities.

    The mean and standard error of fixation counts for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    The mean and standard error of take-over reaction time for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities.

    The mean and standard error of take-over reaction time for type A, type B, and type C autonomous driving information display types under various scenario complexities. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (sign... by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “... by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.

    Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group. by Silas Manning (22693338)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Introgression decreases allelic shuffling.

    Introgression decreases allelic shuffling. by Enrique J. Schwarzkopf (6579275)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Table 1_Subjective spatial orientation discomfort is associated with decreased real-world spatial performance and lower cognitive function.docx

    Table 1_Subjective spatial orientation discomfort is associated with decreased real-world spatial performance and lower cognitive function.docx by Johannes Gerb (10287758)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Mean case duration before and after intervention (t-statistic = -3.35, p <i>< </i>0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference in means.

    Mean case duration before and after intervention (t-statistic = -3.35, p <i>< </i>0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference in means. by Mohammad Bakhtiari (11838264)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Summary of significant treatment × time effect.

    Summary of significant treatment × time effect. by Wensheng Xiao (16557866)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    The mean and standard deviation of parameters.

    The mean and standard deviation of parameters. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Most significant muscle activation values.

    Most significant muscle activation values. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Line graph showing the increase or decrease in the average number of bee swarms caught over the past three years (Mean 

    Line graph showing the increase or decrease in the average number of bee swarms caught over the past three years (Mean  by Beatrice T. Nganso (4114768)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Summary of significant single-arm time effect.

    Summary of significant single-arm time effect. by Wensheng Xiao (16557866)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: