Search alternatives:
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Comparison of renal tissue pathological damage grades across different groups at all time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
Summary map of all contacts with statistically significant SVM classifications.
Published 2024“…Yellow reflects high classification accuracy, while dark blue represents less robust classification accuracy. Time-frequency points with no significant classification value are white.…”
-
13
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
14
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…The Y-axis represents the fold change, while the X-axis indicates the significance of differential expression. The gray points represent miRNAs with no significant change (p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05), while red and blue points indicate upregulated and downregulated miRNAs (p < 0.05, FDR q < 0.05), respectively. …”
-
15
-
16
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
17
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
18
-
19
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
20