Search alternatives:
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
HFD decreases intermediate-term memory.
Published 2025“…<p>(A) The survival rate of 10d <i>Canton-S</i> fed with ND or HFD was observed for 7 days. There was no significant decline in the survival rate in flies fed with HFD compared with ND (n = 10 vials, containing 20 flies at each time point). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …”
-
17
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20