Search alternatives:
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
HFD decreases intermediate-term memory.
Published 2025“…<p>(A) The survival rate of 10d <i>Canton-S</i> fed with ND or HFD was observed for 7 days. There was no significant decline in the survival rate in flies fed with HFD compared with ND (n = 10 vials, containing 20 flies at each time point). …”
-
3
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Sodium level changes in matched restaurant menu items (2016–2020) by UK NSRI food category.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
The observed MRM reactions.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Purpose</p><p>Statins are the most commonly used drugs worldwide. Besides a significant decrease in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk, the use of statins is also connected with a broad beneficial pleiotropic effect. …”
-
13
NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission.
Published 2025“…The excitatory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant increase, with statistically significant differences observed when compared to WT mice (***P < 0.001). …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20