Table 3_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.docx by Ji Zhou (481629)

“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”

Table 1_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.doc by Ji Zhou (481629)

“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”

The correlogram. by Bingtao Su (4740009)

“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”

The food consumption quantity. by Bingtao Su (4740009)

“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”

Dataset. by Bingtao Su (4740009)

“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”

Fig 5 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 4 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Scatter plots of the linear regression for the relationship between the duration of the vegetative phase and the average mass of single inflorescences. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 6 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 9 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 8 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Individual data. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Descriptive statistics. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Time matched metabolic cost. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Research design. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Time matched physiological strain. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Physiological strain. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Diagram of exercise intervention progression. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Perceived exertion. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”

Metabolic cost. by JoEllen M. Sefton (16880253)

“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”