Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1201
Block diagram of the proposed system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1202
Chart for applicable amount of fertilizers.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1203
Cost analysis of irrigation controller unit.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1204
Run times of two algorithms.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1205
Flow chart of Fuzzy Logic based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1206
Block diagram for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1207
Flow chart of Average Value-based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1208
Hardware design for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1209
-
1210
-
1211
Validation and predictive accuracy of the cerebrovascular model,
Published 2025“…This observation suggests that the myogenic response is potentially linearly potentiated with increasing WT; however, the decreased constriction ability of muscles in the sloped phase, is proven to be advantageous for the vasculature, as it prevents reduced blood flow in deeper layers at high ABNP values. …”
-
1212
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Results indicated that both the DFAT and DFAT + bFGF groups exhibited significantly reduced glottic gaps, increased collagen deposition, and decreased TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells compared to controls. …”
-
1213
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Published 2025“…Analysis of bacterial abundance revealed a shift in trends as the disease combined from control to NSESKD and SESKD group, respectively, across 7 genera: <i><i>Actinobacillus</i></i>, <i>TM7x</i>, <i><i>Capnocytophaga</i></i>, <i><i>Neisseria</i></i>, and <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> increased in abundance, while <i><i>Actinomyces</i></i> and <i><i>Atopobium</i></i> decreased. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> as a potential biomarker for ESKD (both with and without sarcopenia).…”
-
1214
-
1215
-
1216
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
1217
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
1218
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
1219
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
1220
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”