Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1161
Image 13_Serum neuritin as a predictive biomarker of early neurological deterioration and poor prognosis after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.tif
Published 2025“…END was defined as a decrease of ≥2 points in the GCS score within 24 h of admission. …”
-
1162
Image 1_Boys born with hypospadias and fetal growth restriction exhibit shorter anogenital distances: a retrospective cross-sectional study.tif
Published 2025“…Linear regression analysis revealed that proximal hypospadias and SGA were significantly associated with shorter AGDs across all measurements (e.g., proximal hypospadias reduced ASD by 6.52 mm, 95% CI: −9.97 to −3.06, P < 0.001; SGA reduced ASD by 4.48 mm, 95% CI: −8.00 to −0.97, P = 0.01). …”
-
1163
Table 1_Relationship between advanced lung cancer inflammation index and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among chronic inflammatory airway diseases patients: a population-ba...
Published 2025“…An elevated ALI was significantly related to a decreased risk of all-cause mortality, as well as mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among CIAD patients. …”
-
1164
Fig 4 -
Published 2024“…Population-level averaged inversion and negation effects and Bayesian non-linear mixed model predictions as a function of Orientation filter</b>. …”
-
1165
Data Sheet 1_Lack of association between genetic variations in CYP3A5 and blood pressure or hypertension risk in the UK biobank.pdf
Published 2025“…While some previous studies reported that CYP3A5 variants were associated with decreased blood pressure and risk of HTN, others reported no associations. …”
-
1166
Table 1_Association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in adults: the mediating role of body mass index.docx
Published 2025“…RCS analysis further revealed a linear relationship between DI-GM and MetS prevalence. …”
-
1167
Data Sheet 1_Longitudinal changes in bodyweight, body condition, and muscle condition in ageing pet cats: findings from the Cat Prospective Ageing and Welfare Study.docx
Published 2025“…All three metrics showed significant non-linear associations with age. Bodyweight increased slightly from age 7 to 10 (estimated marginal mean 4.77–4.82 kg) before decreasing to 4.30 kg by age 16 years. …”
-
1168
SEAwise Report on improved predictive models of growth, production and stock quality under different habitat scenarios and incorporating experimental results
Published 2025“…Summer temperature was not a significant driver of the individual growth. Mediated length-based growth models and linear mixed models applied to weight-at-age data of six stocks showed forecast potential for only one stock (sol.27.20-24). …”
-
1169
Ultimate Lateral resistance of Tetrapod Pile Foundation in Rate-dependent and Strain-softening Clay
Published 2025“…The effect of the reciprocal of soil sensitivity is more significant, while the strain rate <b>exhibits</b> a linear positive interaction with the ultimate lateral resistance. …”
-
1170
Table 1_Global, regional, and national burdens of rheumatoid arthritis among people aged 60 years and older from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Stu...
Published 2025“…Background<p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses a significant global health burden, especially among individuals aged 60 and older. …”
-
1171
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1172
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1173
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1174
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1175
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1176
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1177
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1178
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1179
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1180
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”