Showing 41 - 60 results of 7,150 for search '(( significantly ((teer decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant gap increased ))', query time: 0.21s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43
  4. 44
  5. 45

    Data_Sheet_2_Analysis of global nutrient gaps and their potential to be closed through redistribution and increased supply.CSV by Andrew J. Fletcher (14268272)

    Published 2024
    “…Our findings reveal that while some nutrients appear to be adequately supplied on a global scale, many countries face national insufficiencies (% supply below the population reference intake) in essential vitamins and minerals, such as vitamins A, B12, B2, potassium, and iron. Closing these gaps will require significant increases in nutrient supply. …”
  6. 46

    Data_Sheet_1_Analysis of global nutrient gaps and their potential to be closed through redistribution and increased supply.PDF by Andrew J. Fletcher (14268272)

    Published 2024
    “…Our findings reveal that while some nutrients appear to be adequately supplied on a global scale, many countries face national insufficiencies (% supply below the population reference intake) in essential vitamins and minerals, such as vitamins A, B12, B2, potassium, and iron. Closing these gaps will require significant increases in nutrient supply. …”
  7. 47

    The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER. by Charlotte J. van Ginkel (20790466)

    Published 2025
    “…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
  8. 48
  9. 49
  10. 50
  11. 51
  12. 52
  13. 53
  14. 54

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  15. 55
  16. 56
  17. 57
  18. 58
  19. 59
  20. 60