Search alternatives:
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
Entanglement of <i>Daphnia magna</i> by Fibrous Microplastics through “Hook and Loop” Action
Published 2024Subjects: -
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
Table_1_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.DOCX
Published 2021“…Using a null model approach, we found that small flocks were more phenotypically clumped for body size than expected by chance; however, phenotypic clumping decreased as flocks increased in size and approached expected phenotypic variation in large flocks. …”
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
Data_Sheet_2_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.csv
Published 2021“…Using a null model approach, we found that small flocks were more phenotypically clumped for body size than expected by chance; however, phenotypic clumping decreased as flocks increased in size and approached expected phenotypic variation in large flocks. …”
-
36
Data_Sheet_1_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.csv
Published 2021“…Using a null model approach, we found that small flocks were more phenotypically clumped for body size than expected by chance; however, phenotypic clumping decreased as flocks increased in size and approached expected phenotypic variation in large flocks. …”
-
37
Data_Sheet_3_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.csv
Published 2021“…Using a null model approach, we found that small flocks were more phenotypically clumped for body size than expected by chance; however, phenotypic clumping decreased as flocks increased in size and approached expected phenotypic variation in large flocks. …”
-
38
-
39
-
40