Showing 101 - 120 results of 6,900 for search '(( significantly ((teer decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( significant we decrease ))', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 101

    Logistic regression for LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  2. 102

    Logistic regression for HSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  3. 103

    Logistic regression for overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  4. 104

    BMISES_Data_Part1. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  5. 105

    Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  6. 106

    Baseline characteristics of overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  7. 107

    Diagram of study population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  8. 108

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  9. 109

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  10. 110

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  11. 111
  12. 112

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  13. 113

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  14. 114

    Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  15. 115

    Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  16. 116
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119

    Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites.... by Emir Matpan (21655811)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. …”
  20. 120