Search alternatives:
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
2741
Study flowchart.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2742
Data.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2743
CONSORT diagram of the study.
Published 2024“…The control group showed a significant increase in COM angle sway excursion (lateral direction) (p = 0.011, d = 0.27, 95% CI [-0.19, 0.74]) and a decrease in TMT-A time (p = 0.031, d = 0.38, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.85]). …”
-
2744
Qualitative Examples of Corrected Sentences.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2745
Ablation Experiment Results.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2746
Meaning of Each Model.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2747
Overview of Related Work.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2748
Parameter Settings.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2749
Comparison with Advanced Models.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2750
Overall Model Architecture.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2751
Baseline Transformer model configuration.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2752
Comparison Results on CoNLL-2014 Dataset.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2753
Histogram of the extracted parameters.
Published 2025“…No significant associations were found with long-term outcomes.…”
-
2754
-
2755
Study selection flow diagram.
Published 2025“…The review findings emphasize the need for international registry data to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, explore strategies to decrease the risk of major complications, and improve postoperative quality of life. …”
-
2756
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Published 2025“…The review findings emphasize the need for international registry data to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, explore strategies to decrease the risk of major complications, and improve postoperative quality of life. …”
-
2757
Key characteristics of the included publications.
Published 2025“…The review findings emphasize the need for international registry data to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, explore strategies to decrease the risk of major complications, and improve postoperative quality of life. …”
-
2758
-
2759
-
2760