Donut chart shows Demographic structure and Employment categorization. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

i & ii: PCA represent the (i) 2d and (ii) 3d to identify the underlying dimensions of the lifestyle questions. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Multiple linear regression analysis results. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Stack column chart represent Depersonalization through demographic structure. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Stack column chart represent Personal Accomplishment through demographic structure. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Heatmap represents the criterion of health lifestyle survey. (Color guide is provided above each figure). by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

S3 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

The images of erosion control dams (ECDs) with three different exteriors. by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

S5 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

S1 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

Experimental procedure performed in this study. by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

S2 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

Participant characteristics (<i>n</i> = 34). by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

S4 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

S6 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

Subjects:

Renal outcomes of both treatment groups. by Marwan El-Deyarbi (21688492)

“…Participants in the multifactorial group achieved a significant mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (mean difference = −0.14, 95% CI: −0.27–0.001, P < 0.03), and significant adjusted mean difference of eGFR levels difference (3.93 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI: 1.27–6.58, P < 0.01) at study completion compared to those in the control group. …”