بدائل البحث:
significant challenges » significant challenge (توسيع البحث), significant changes (توسيع البحث)
challenges decrease » challenges case (توسيع البحث)
teer decrease » mean decrease (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant challenges » significant challenge (توسيع البحث), significant changes (توسيع البحث)
challenges decrease » challenges case (توسيع البحث)
teer decrease » mean decrease (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
HFD decreases intermediate-term memory.
منشور في 2025"…<p>(A) The survival rate of 10d <i>Canton-S</i> fed with ND or HFD was observed for 7 days. There was no significant decline in the survival rate in flies fed with HFD compared with ND (n = 10 vials, containing 20 flies at each time point). …"
-
156
-
157
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
منشور في 2025"…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …"
-
158
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
منشور في 2025"…In this case-control study, a surface electromyography (sEMG) was conducted in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis (PLB) musculature during the layup gesture, on 58 female basketball players, 29 with and 29 without CAI. The presence of significant differences in the group: measurement interaction was found in the variables left PLL RMS left-hand layup and right PLL maximum peak left-hand layup (X<sup>2</sup>(6)=22.246, p = 0.001, X<sup>2</sup>(6)=12.99, p = 0.043) respectively, where higher normalized activation values are observed in CAI group. …"
-
159
-
160