Search alternatives:
significantly shorter » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search)
varyer decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
shorter areas » shore area (Expand Search), shorter variants (Expand Search)
significantly shorter » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search)
varyer decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
shorter areas » shore area (Expand Search), shorter variants (Expand Search)
-
1
The dissection time per unit area was significantly shorter in group E than group C (minute).
Published 2025“…<p>The dissection time per unit area was significantly shorter in group E than group C (minute).…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20