Showing 4,041 - 4,060 results of 21,342 for search '(( significantly ((we decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.64s Refine Results
  1. 4041
  2. 4042
  3. 4043
  4. 4044
  5. 4045
  6. 4046
  7. 4047
  8. 4048
  9. 4049
  10. 4050
  11. 4051
  12. 4052
  13. 4053
  14. 4054
  15. 4055

    Model selection based on best fit. by Angelina Mageni Lutambi (22097223)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Malaria remains a significant public health challenge, particularly among vulnerable populations in high-burden countries like Tanzania. …”
  16. 4056

    Basic characteristics included in the study. by Juan Gu (288925)

    Published 2025
    “…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
  17. 4057

    Publication bias of the risk of all groups. by Juan Gu (288925)

    Published 2025
    “…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
  18. 4058

    Implementation framework. by Amos Asiedu (4996946)

    Published 2025
    “…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”
  19. 4059

    Study selection process. by Juan Gu (288925)

    Published 2025
    “…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
  20. 4060

    DHIMS2 data quality over time. by Amos Asiedu (4996946)

    Published 2025
    “…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”