Search alternatives:
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
102
-
103
-
104
Words for describing activities that decrease and/or increase Subjective Well-Being.
Published 2022Subjects: -
105
-
106
Column-based Technology for CD9-HPLC Immunoaffinity Isolation of Serum Extracellular Vesicles
Published 2021Subjects: -
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
Data_Sheet_1_Immune and Neuroendocrine Trait and State Markers in Psychotic Illness: Decreased Kynurenines Marking Psychotic Exacerbations.docx
Published 2020“…Normalization of KA and 3-HK levels between admission and follow-up corresponded to a larger improvement of negative symptoms (r = 0.5, p < 0.030) A reverse association was found between relative improvement of SDST scores and decreasing KA levels (r = 0.5, p < 0.010).…”
-
111
Data_Sheet_1_Secondhand Smoke Decreased Excitability and Altered Action Potential Characteristics of Cardiac Vagal Neurons in Mice.PDF
Published 2021“…<p>Background: Secondhand smoke (SHS), a major indoor pollutant, is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality including arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. …”
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
119
-
120