Search alternatives:
significantly fold » significantly older (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
fold increased » fold increase (Expand Search), could increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly fold » significantly older (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
fold increased » fold increase (Expand Search), could increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
Data_Sheet_3_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.csv
Published 2021“…We found that sites with smaller flocks had higher values of phenotypic clumping for body size and sites with larger flocks were less phenotypically clumped. …”
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
KEGG NET formation pathway illustrating the fold changes (log2) for significantly upregulated genes at different time points.
Published 2022“…B) As above but illustrating the significantly increased expression of genes in TB patients with high PET-scores compared to those with low PET-scores. …”
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60
Table_1_Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentrations 72 Hours Following Marathon Running.DOCX
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: Linear mixed-model analyses revealed a main effect of time for BDNF concentrations over the study period (F<sub>(4,89.389)</sub> = 4.296, p = 0.003). Values decreased significantly with the lowest values at 72 h after the marathon compared to baseline (p = 0.025), a finding that was more pronounced in the larger male cohort.…”