Search alternatives:
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
PTable S5 Markers of each cell cluster.
Published 2025“…However, the function of tryptophan metabolism in the immune characteristics of sepsis still needs to be elucidated.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We collected the datasets from the GEO database to extract data of blood samples RNA of patients with or without sepsis in GSE28750, GSE65682, GSE69528, and GSE137342. …”
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Univariate linear regression analysis of scales.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Objective</p><p>Body image perception significantly impacts university students’ well-being and potentially their creativity. …”
-
33
Overview of the WeARTolerance program.
Published 2024“…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
39
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
40
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”