Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
14681
Data Sheet 1_Association between life’s crucial 9 and severe abdominal aortic calcification in U.S. Adults: the mediating role of the systemic inflammatory response index.docx
Published 2025“…Mediation analysis revealed that the SIRI significantly influenced the linkage between LC9 and SAAC, accounting for 5.8% of the mediation effect, with a statistically significant p-value (P < 0.001).…”
-
14682
Supplementary file 1_Effectiveness and impact of intravenous magnesium sulfate in spinal surgery systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…Magnesium sulfate administration significantly reduced pain scores at 24 h (MD −0.18, 95% CI: −0.34 to −0.02) and decreased opioid consumption (SMD −0.34, 95% CI: −1.07 to −0.35). …”
-
14683
Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published 2025“…</p> <p>Although a trend of increased cardiovascular risks was found considering dose, no significantly increased cardiovascular risk was associated with JAKinibs in IBD patients, and Deucravacitinib significantly decreased the risks of VTE and CVE.…”
-
14684
Data Sheet 1_Potential geographical distribution of Cordyceps cicadae and its two hosts in China under climate change.docx
Published 2025“…C. cicadae thrived on steep slopes. and some of which also significantly affect the distribution of its two hosts. …”
-
14685
Image 1_Effects of electronic excitation on cascade dynamics in tungsten.pdf
Published 2025“…The results showed that the electronic effect has significant impacts on the formation of irradiation defects, especially under high-energy irradiation. …”
-
14686
Data Sheet 1_SWG5 regulates grain size and weight via sugar metabolism-mediated signaling in rice.pdf
Published 2025“…<p>Grain size significantly affects rice yield and quality. Although several genes that regulate grain size have been identified, their mechanisms remain unclear. …”
-
14687
Video 2_Effects of electronic excitation on cascade dynamics in tungsten.wmv
Published 2025“…The results showed that the electronic effect has significant impacts on the formation of irradiation defects, especially under high-energy irradiation. …”
-
14688
Video 1_Effects of electronic excitation on cascade dynamics in tungsten.wmv
Published 2025“…The results showed that the electronic effect has significant impacts on the formation of irradiation defects, especially under high-energy irradiation. …”
-
14689
Table 1_The relationship between positive future thinking, entrapment, defeat and death-related mental imagery in individuals with and without a suicidal history: an experimental s...
Published 2025“…Mean scores for PFT from pre-to post-negative mood induction decreased significantly in the participants with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours but not in those without a suicidal history. …”
-
14690
Supplementary file 1_The action of ginsenoside Rg1 in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: a controlled clinical trial.docx
Published 2025“…No significant intergroup differences were observed in arterial stiffness index (P > 0.05). …”
-
14691
CCDC66 localizes to the axoneme and regulates primary cilium stability but not cilia formation in IMCD3 cells.
Published 2025“…<i>n</i> > 600 cells for control and >400 cells for CCDC66 depletion. The mean cilia length in CCDC66-depleted cells decreased to 0.67-fold compared to the mean control length. …”
-
14692
Table 1_Effect of cholecalciferol on immune and vascular function in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>In total, 62 subjects were studied. The mean age was 44 ± 12 years with 58% men. TH1 cells decreased from 17% (9%, 27%) to 11% (6%, 16%) (p=0.002) and TH2 cells increased from 9% (5%, 16%) to 16% (10%, 27%) (p=0.001) after cholecalciferol treatment. …”
-
14693
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14694
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14695
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14696
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14697
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14698
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
14699
Data Sheet 1_Virological response and predictive factors for antiviral treatment in chronic HBV-related liver disease with low ALT and high HBV DNA.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>A retrospective study grouped chronic HBV patients by baseline ALT: ALT > 80 U/L (significantly elevated group, SAG), 40-80 U/L (mildly elevated group, MAG), and ≤ 40 U/L (normal group, NG). …”
-
14700
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”