Search alternatives:
significant group » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
group during » groups during (Expand Search), group using (Expand Search), group living (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant group » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
group during » groups during (Expand Search), group using (Expand Search), group living (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
Temporal and intergroup analysis of intraocular pressure changes following eye drop administration.
Published 2023Subjects: -
103
-
104
-
105
Supplementary Material for: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Radical Cystectomy Decreases Postoperative Complications at Different Times
Published 2021“…Mean length of stay did not differ significantly between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (12.7 ± 6.2 and 13.1 ± 5.7 days, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.743). …”
-
106
Replication data set: Variability and correlations decrease during task states in human fMRI data.
Published 2020“…<b>h)</b> We found that the average correlation for each brain region, decreased for each brain region during task state. …”
-
107
Renal outcomes of both treatment groups.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>During a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, 40.4% of the participants in the intervention group (31.6% in the control group) achieved diabetes control (HbA1c < 7%), with a significant mean difference of −0.36% in HbA1c levels between the groups (95% CI: −0.54 – −0.19, P < 0.01). …”
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
Mean body weight.
Published 2024“…The control and experimental groups differed significantly overall, as well as males versus females, but there were no significant group interactions.…”
-
119
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
120
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”