Showing 1 - 20 results of 114 for search '(( significantly ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly enhance decrease ))~', query time: 0.35s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Mean parameter values for the selected crops. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

    Published 2025
    “…In this article, we present a complete integrated design of a smart IoT-based suitable agricultural land and crop selection, along with an irrigation system using agricultural mapping, machine learning, and fuzzy logic for precision agriculture. …”
  2. 2

    Structure diagram of ensemble model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  3. 3

    Fitting formula parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  4. 4

    Test plan. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  5. 5

    Fitting surface parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  6. 6

    Model generalisation validation error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  7. 7

    Empirical model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  8. 8

    Fitting curve parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  9. 9

    Test instrument. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  10. 10

    Empirical model establishment process. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  11. 11

    Model prediction error trend chart. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  12. 12

    Basic physical parameters of red clay. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  13. 13

    BP neural network structure diagram. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  14. 14

    Structure diagram of GBDT model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  15. 15

    Model prediction error analysis index. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  16. 16

    Fitting curve parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  17. 17

    Model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  18. 18

    Demographic data. by Narisa Rattanalert (21445983)

    Published 2025
    “…The participants practiced on the schematic eye as much as needed to feel confident in their skills. Mean rubric scores indicative of LIO-ROP skills significantly improved from 2.94 to 3.59 out of 4 (P < 0.001), and the time required for the laser procedure decreased from 17.19 to 15.14 minutes in pre- and post-LIO-ROP practice, respectively. …”
  19. 19

    PRISMA flowchart of the included studies. by Gaelle Salame (21077899)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>The combined data showed that patients receiving immunotherapy had higher C-peptide levels (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [-2.56, 5.58]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). …”
  20. 20

    Characteristics of Included Studies. by Gaelle Salame (21077899)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>The combined data showed that patients receiving immunotherapy had higher C-peptide levels (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [-2.56, 5.58]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). …”