Search alternatives:
significantly enhance » significantly enhanced (Expand Search), significantly influenced (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly enhance » significantly enhanced (Expand Search), significantly influenced (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Mean parameter values for the selected crops.
Published 2025“…In this article, we present a complete integrated design of a smart IoT-based suitable agricultural land and crop selection, along with an irrigation system using agricultural mapping, machine learning, and fuzzy logic for precision agriculture. …”
-
2
Structure diagram of ensemble model.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
3
Fitting formula parameter table.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
4
Test plan.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
5
Fitting surface parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
6
Model generalisation validation error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
7
Empirical model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
8
Fitting curve parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
9
Test instrument.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
10
Empirical model establishment process.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
11
Model prediction error trend chart.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
12
Basic physical parameters of red clay.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
13
BP neural network structure diagram.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
14
Structure diagram of GBDT model.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
15
Model prediction error analysis index.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
16
Fitting curve parameter table.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
17
Model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
18
Demographic data.
Published 2025“…The participants practiced on the schematic eye as much as needed to feel confident in their skills. Mean rubric scores indicative of LIO-ROP skills significantly improved from 2.94 to 3.59 out of 4 (P < 0.001), and the time required for the laser procedure decreased from 17.19 to 15.14 minutes in pre- and post-LIO-ROP practice, respectively. …”
-
19
PRISMA flowchart of the included studies.
Published 2025“…</p><p>The combined data showed that patients receiving immunotherapy had higher C-peptide levels (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [-2.56, 5.58]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). …”
-
20
Characteristics of Included Studies.
Published 2025“…</p><p>The combined data showed that patients receiving immunotherapy had higher C-peptide levels (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [-2.56, 5.58]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). …”