Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
5101
Strength test results of semi-circular specimens.
Published 2025“…Experimental results show that the ZM modifier significantly improves the dynamic stability and rutting resistance of the mixture, with dynamic stability increasing to 5245 and rut depth decreasing to 2.26 mm at a dosage of 0.5%. …”
-
5102
Bending test results of beam specimens.
Published 2025“…Experimental results show that the ZM modifier significantly improves the dynamic stability and rutting resistance of the mixture, with dynamic stability increasing to 5245 and rut depth decreasing to 2.26 mm at a dosage of 0.5%. …”
-
5103
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5104
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5105
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5106
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5107
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5108
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5109
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5110
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…When the microtexture area occupancy is 50%, it is worth noting that the micropit and micropillar surfaces have nearly same roughness (<i>Sa</i>), but the Leidenfrost temperature was notably higher on the micropit surface with negative skewness (<i>Ssk</i> < 0), which was related to differences in vapor flow dynamics. We further find that the Weber number (<i>We</i>) significantly influences the Leidenfrost point, with the droplet impact wall behavior going through the states of film bounce back, ejecting tiny droplets and bounce back, and ultimately droplet breakup as the <i>We</i> increases. …”
-
5111
Complementary conditioning measures across the clinical study groups.
Published 2024“…Post hoc tests showed significant decreases for the surgical group (<i>P</i> = 0.05), while in the remaining groups, results did not reach significance (Healthy, <i>P</i> = 0.4; Obese, <i>P</i> = 0.1). …”
-
5112
-
5113
-
5114
-
5115
-
5116
-
5117
-
5118
-
5119
-
5120