Showing 101 - 120 results of 6,900 for search '(( significantly ((we decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ) OR ( significantly linear decrease ))*', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  6. 106

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  7. 107

    Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  8. 108

    Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  9. 109
  10. 110

    Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites.... by Emir Matpan (21655811)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. …”
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119
  20. 120

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”