يعرض 1,241 - 1,260 نتائج من 2,520 نتيجة بحث عن '(( significantly ((weaker decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ) OR ( significant linear decrease ))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.43s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1241

    Hourly power generation of solar and wind. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  2. 1242

    Cooling power of SREH in Case Study-IV. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  3. 1243

    Technical features of PHEV battery. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  4. 1244

    Electrical power of SREH in Case Study-III. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  5. 1245

    Heating power of SREH in Case Study-III. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  6. 1246

    Conceptual framework of REH under study. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  7. 1247

    Energy hub architecture. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  8. 1248

    Electricity and gas prices. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  9. 1249

    Technical features of central devices. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  10. 1250

    Results for Case Study-I. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  11. 1251

    Technical features of wind turbine. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  12. 1252

    Heating power of SREH in Case Study-IV. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  13. 1253

    Electrical power of SREH in Case Study-IV. حسب Nouman Qamar (21511939)

    منشور في 2025
    "…This work proposed a stochastic model for REH using mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimally handle the associated uncertainties of RES and PEHVs, which was then solved using GAMS software. …"
  14. 1254

    Participant interview topics. حسب Lex D. de Jong (22138778)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Outcomes were evaluated with a multilevel linear regression analysis at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. …"
  15. 1255

    The participants’ baseline characteristics. حسب Lex D. de Jong (22138778)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Outcomes were evaluated with a multilevel linear regression analysis at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. …"
  16. 1256
  17. 1257

    Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up. حسب Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    منشور في 2025
    "…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …"
  18. 1258

    Data. حسب Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …"
  19. 1259

    Baseline characteristics of patients. حسب Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …"
  20. 1260

    Variability in performance and response to task dynamics. حسب Daniel Ramandi (10047543)

    منشور في 2025
    "…(B) The analysis of trajectory variability, quantified as DTW distance of consecutive trials, showed a non-significant trend towards greater variability in zQ175 mice, peaking later compared to WT mice (RM two-way ANOVA, genotype p = 0.070 F(1, 20) = 3.660, trial p = 0.0005 F(4.291, 85.82) = 5.351, interaction p = 0.542 F(19, 380) = 0.9329). …"