Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
Alterations of Ceramides, Acylcarnitines, GlyceroLPLs, and Amines in NSCLC Tissues
Published 2024Subjects: -
67
-
68
-
69
B2 decreases glycolytic intermediates in cells.
Published 2025“…<b>(B)</b> Early glycolytic intermediates and the ratio of F-6-P to F-1,6-BP (<i>lower right</i>) are shown. <b>(C)</b> Heatmap of targeted metabolomic data. …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
Green Hydrogen Economy: Scenarios versus Technologies
Published 2025“…Historical trends in LCOH indicate that lower off-grid renewable electricity costs are pivotal in decreasing production expenses, whereas electrolysis efficiencies remain relatively constant. …”
-
78
Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
-
79
Results of the colorimetric MTT test.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
-
80
IOP fluctuation.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”