Search alternatives:
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 207,087 for search '(( significantly ((weaker decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ) OR ( significant increases _ ))', query time: 1.94s Refine Results
  1. 1
    N-acetilcysteine prevents the <i>A</i>. <i>simplex</i> CE-induced TEER decrease.

    N-acetilcysteine prevents the <i>A</i>. <i>simplex</i> CE-induced TEER decrease. by Noelia Carballeda-Sangiao (2889611)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    BA attenuated the decrease in the integrity and increase in the permeability of the epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 cell monolayers.

    BA attenuated the decrease in the integrity and increase in the permeability of the epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 cell monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    JNJ26993135 + BML-111 decreases permeability and enhances ZO-1 and claudin-1 induced by PAF but does not change TEER.

    JNJ26993135 + BML-111 decreases permeability and enhances ZO-1 and claudin-1 induced by PAF but does not change TEER. by Kameljit K. Kalsi (16496511)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Mean T2* and T2 relaxation time of the 10 participants.

    Mean T2* and T2 relaxation time of the 10 participants. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Absolute and relative changes of the T2 relaxation times during prolonged running.

    Absolute and relative changes of the T2 relaxation times during prolonged running. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Schematic diagram of the scanning and running procedure.

    Schematic diagram of the scanning and running procedure. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    First tab: Volunteer details.

    First tab: Volunteer details. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Example of muscle segmentation.

    Example of muscle segmentation. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Mean T2* and T2 relaxation time of the 10 participants.

    Mean T2* and T2 relaxation time of the 10 participants. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Demographic and physiologic characteristics of the subjects.

    Demographic and physiologic characteristics of the subjects. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Absolute and relative changes of the T2* relaxation times during prolonged running.

    Absolute and relative changes of the T2* relaxation times during prolonged running. by Charlotte Zaeske (12101949)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).

    Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6). by Shirko Marcel Shokr (19173337)

    Published 2024
    “…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Host population bottlenecks decrease microbiome diversity.

    Host population bottlenecks decrease microbiome diversity. by Michael Ørsted (5926028)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss.

    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss. by Hongmei Qian (538647)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Micropatterning significantly increases cell density.

    Micropatterning significantly increases cell density. by Matthew W. Hagen (627944)

    Published 2019
    “…(B) Micropatterning significantly increases cell density across other culture conditions (p = 0.0002). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss.

    Autophagy significantly increases RGCs loss. by Hongmei Qian (538647)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Transepithelial resistance of NHBE decreases significantly after PAA exposure.

    Transepithelial resistance of NHBE decreases significantly after PAA exposure. by Ellie S. Burns (21246537)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Output-potent activity increase significantly.

    Output-potent activity increase significantly. by Chenguang Zhang (457185)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    1-MX significantly increases levels of neurotransmitters.

    1-MX significantly increases levels of neurotransmitters. by Ralf Jäger (35049)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: