Search alternatives:
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
Survival function analysis for LTFU according to Viral Load status and BMI status.
Published 2025Subjects: -
148
-
149
Annual incidence rate per 100 person-years trend for ART treatment outcomes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
Table 2_Expression and prognostic significance of the m6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC in HNSCC.docx
Published 2025“…Knockdown of HNRNPC in the HNSCC cell lines HSC-3 and CAL-27 resulted in a significant decrease in proliferation, invasion, and malignant transformation abilities. …”
-
156
Table 1_Expression and prognostic significance of the m6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC in HNSCC.docx
Published 2025“…Knockdown of HNRNPC in the HNSCC cell lines HSC-3 and CAL-27 resulted in a significant decrease in proliferation, invasion, and malignant transformation abilities. …”
-
157
Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
-
158
Results of the colorimetric MTT test.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
-
159
IOP fluctuation.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
-
160
IOP fluctuation.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”