Search alternatives:
significantly 19 » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly i (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
19 increases » 1 increases (Expand Search), _ increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significantly 19 » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly i (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
19 increases » 1 increases (Expand Search), _ increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Statistically significant linear increase in use of antidepressants during the observed time period.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Significant condition.
Published 2024“…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
-
11
-
12
Results of significance for regression factors.
Published 2024“…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
-
13
-
14
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…Pathway analysis revealed a marked decrease in expression within certain key metabolic pathways (such as the one-carbon pool by folate) in the NAFLD group, while expression in DNA repair-related pathways (such as non-homologous end joining) was significantly increased. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
19
-
20