Search alternatives:
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
Trend of specific mental health disorders for all services utilization between 2016 and 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
Box plot displaying the distributions of the deconvolution derived proportions of cell types.
Published 2024Subjects: -
157
Spearman correlation of age with proportions of cell types in men, for each brain region.
Published 2024Subjects: -
158
Threading Behavior and Dynamics of Ring-Linear Polymer Blends under Poiseuille Flow
Published 2024“…However, as rings are semiflexible (<i>K</i><sub>br</sub> > 0), the threading probability significantly decreases and then significantly increases as the flow field strength increases. …”
-
159
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
160
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”