Search alternatives:
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
5
Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx
Published 2025“…The findings showed that, from BIT to AIT, the area proportion of ultraoligotrophic state significantly decreased, while the area proportion of oligotrophic, mesotrophic, and eutrophic states significantly increased, with eutrophic state observed for the first time in 2017. …”
-
6
Contains R code utilized in the analyses.
Published 2024“…Spearman correlation analysis between the individuals’ calendar ages and cell type proportions revealed a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of neurons with increasing age. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Description of the warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
13
Flow chart of the study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
14
Summary statistics of the sample.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
15
Product attributes and attribute levels.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
16
Dataset used in this study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
17
Definitions of the variables.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
18
A sample choice question without a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
19
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
20
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”