Search alternatives:
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
affect decreased » effects decreased (Expand Search), bfrt decreased (Expand Search)
decreased » increased (Expand Search)
decrease » increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 15,850 for search '(( significantly affect decreased ) OR ( significant clusters decrease ))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Significant clusters: Coronal PET images showing brain regions with significant (p < 0.001 and K > 50) metabolic inhibition (A-G) and activation (H-I) in rats following cocaine self-administration.

    Significant clusters: Coronal PET images showing brain regions with significant (p < 0.001 and K > 50) metabolic inhibition (A-G) and activation (H-I) in rats following cocaine sel... by Christopher Rowan (21499924)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Brain regions with significant metabolic inhibition (p < 0.001, K = 50) (A) and activation (B) in rats following cocaine self-administration compared to baseline. Cluster location is both noted and indicated by coordinates in stereotaxic space (medial-lateral, anterior-posterior, and dorsal-ventral). The t-value and Z-scores were calculated from the average BGluM of all voxels within the significant clusters. KE represents the number of voxels in the respective clusters. Each cell under “Brain Region” represents a separate cluster.

    Brain regions with significant metabolic inhibition (p < 0.001, K = 50) (A) and activation (B) in rats following cocaine self-administration compared to baseline. Cluster location... by Christopher Rowan (21499924)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Image_4_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_4_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Image_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Image_3_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_3_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Image_5_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_5_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Image_2_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_2_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Data_Sheet_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.docx

    Data_Sheet_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.docx by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Genes significantly affected by deletion of <i>ryfA</i>.

    Genes significantly affected by deletion of <i>ryfA</i>. by Hicham Bessaiah (6840980)

    Published 2021
    “…Genes upregulated (yellow rectangles) and downregulated (blue rectangles) by at least 1.7-fold were considered significant with P < 0.05. Dark blue is greater or equal to (≥) a 3-fold decrease. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    The results of SOM clustering.

    The results of SOM clustering. by Jeong-Soo Gim (18058588)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model.

    Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Significant variables in decreasing importance for varietal clustering based on Random forest method.

    Significant variables in decreasing importance for varietal clustering based on Random forest method. by Wilfried Chevalier (10521466)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Downregulation of Opa1 and Marf does affect type II NB numbers but affect differentiated cells in lineage.

    Downregulation of Opa1 and Marf does affect type II NB numbers but affect differentiated cells in lineage. by Dnyanesh Dubal (12085942)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    The results of self-organising map (SOM) clustering.

    The results of self-organising map (SOM) clustering. by Jeong-Soo Gim (18058588)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Unadjusted and adjusted ORs for associations between depressive symptoms and FS cognitive-affective/somatic scores.

    Unadjusted and adjusted ORs for associations between depressive symptoms and FS cognitive-affective/somatic scores. by Shakila Meshkat (12360623)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Multivariate and clustering analysis of metabolomic data.

    Multivariate and clustering analysis of metabolomic data. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Clusters of creep curves under different freeze-thaw cycles.

    Clusters of creep curves under different freeze-thaw cycles. by Dengke Yang (842532)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Creep curve clusters of rock samples with different fracture dip angles.

    Creep curve clusters of rock samples with different fracture dip angles. by Dengke Yang (842532)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Phase 2 significant effects.

    Phase 2 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Phase 1 significant effects.

    Phase 1 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: