Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
affected decrease » affected areas (Expand Search), effects decreased (Expand Search)
increased release » increased reliance (Expand Search), increased relative (Expand Search), increased levels (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
affected decrease » affected areas (Expand Search), effects decreased (Expand Search)
increased release » increased reliance (Expand Search), increased relative (Expand Search), increased levels (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
In microglia, C1 reduced NO release triggered by IFNγ and PolyIC, and did not affect LPS induced cytokine release.
Published 2023“…Treatment with C1 (in blue) did not have a significant effect for the LPS-induced IL6 and TNFα release, but increased the release of IL1β at all tested concentrations (0.025 μM: p = 0.0037, 0.25 μM: p < 0.0001, 2.5 μM: p < 0.0001). …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
C1 alone does not evoke NO release, an increase in cell activity or release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Published 2023“…As shown in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278325#pone.0278325.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a></b>, LPS stimulation induced a significant increase in NO release (p<0.0001). Treatment with C1 or DMSO did not show any significant difference compared to untreated microglia (in white). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Quantification of enzyme activity for CPT1 in experimental groups V-TAC versus TMG-TAC.
Published 2022Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Networks of affect states: Significant paths.
Published 2021“…<p>In this figure, affect states networks are visualized for the Stable and the Increase groups. …”