Search alternatives:
significantly better » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search), significance levels (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly better » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search), significance levels (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
23
-
24
-
25
Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
-
26
-
27
Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
28
Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
29
Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
30
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40