Showing 621 - 640 results of 7,503 for search '(( significantly better decrease ) OR ( significantly ((we decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 621
  2. 622
  3. 623
  4. 624
  5. 625
  6. 626
  7. 627
  8. 628
  9. 629
  10. 630
  11. 631
  12. 632

    Bluetooth beacons with colour coded lanyards. by J Mark Ansermino (13958512)

    Published 2025
    “…During the baseline period, the time to antimicrobials decreased significantly in Kenya (132 and 58 minutes) at control and intervention sites. …”
  13. 633

    Recruitment flow diagram of the current study. by Somayeh Momenyan (10111603)

    Published 2025
    “…Predictors of HRQoL included sociodemographic, psychological, medical, and trauma-related factors collected at baseline. We applied generalized additive mixed models to flexibly capture nonlinear changes in HRQoL over time, and piecewise latent growth curve model to analyze distinct linear phases of recovery across defined time intervals.…”
  14. 634

    AZ10606120 treatment significantly increased cytotoxicity and reduced cell number in a dose-dependent manner. by Matthew Drill (22258391)

    Published 2025
    “…Cell numbers were significantly decreased in cells after treatment with AZ10606120 (50µM) compared to both temozolomide (TMZ; 50µM) treatment and untreated controls. …”
  15. 635
  16. 636
  17. 637
  18. 638

    Cohort characteristics. by Vincent Pey (21433304)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Upon initiation of CPB we observed a significant decrease in arterial whole blood redox potential (101.90 mV + /- 11.52 vs. 41.80 mV + /- 10,26; p < 0.0001). …”
  19. 639

    Study selection criteria. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
  20. 640

    PICOS criteria for the SLR. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”