Showing 1,601 - 1,620 results of 4,469 for search '(( significantly better decrease ) OR ( significantly lower decrease ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 1601
  2. 1602
  3. 1603

    Table 1_Prognostic significance of early alpha fetoprotein and des-gamma carboxy prothrombin responses in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing triple combinati... by Teng Zhang (457128)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Conclusion<p>AFP or DCP response at 6-8 weeks post-therapy predicts better oncological outcomes in patients with uHCC treated with triple therapy.…”
  4. 1604
  5. 1605
  6. 1606

    Participants diagram of the study. by Nirmal Gautam (10031682)

    Published 2025
    “…Moreover, non-consumption of fatty foods and outdoor activities were found to be associated with a decrease in obesity by respectively. However, non-consumption of fruits and vegetables and maternal BMI were significantly correlated with an increased risk of obesity in children () and adolescents () respectively.…”
  7. 1607

    Study scheme. by Ayako Shoji (78037)

    Published 2024
    “…The incidence rate of suspected mild cognitive impairment was significantly lower in the post-CHAP group even after adjusted known factors associated with cognitive disorders. …”
  8. 1608

    Characteristics of the participants. by Ayako Shoji (78037)

    Published 2024
    “…The incidence rate of suspected mild cognitive impairment was significantly lower in the post-CHAP group even after adjusted known factors associated with cognitive disorders. …”
  9. 1609

    Incidence rates of sMCI and sSCI. by Ayako Shoji (78037)

    Published 2024
    “…The incidence rate of suspected mild cognitive impairment was significantly lower in the post-CHAP group even after adjusted known factors associated with cognitive disorders. …”
  10. 1610

    Flow Chart of Study Participant Selection. by Zhi Jin (3742471)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, individuals with long sleep duration (>9 hours) had a significantly decreased risk of CVD (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.85, P = 0.02) compared to those with shorter sleep durations.…”
  11. 1611

    Results of redundancy analysis. by Bianhua Zhang (22430652)

    Published 2025
    “…All the heavy metal contents in MLS were highest significantly except Cd among NL and LFA. Shannon and Chao1 indices in NC were significantly higher than those in MC (p < 0.05), In LFA, Shannon and Chao1 indices of MLX were the highest, while MLS was significantly lower than NL (p < 0.05). …”
  12. 1612
  13. 1613
  14. 1614
  15. 1615

    Supplementary file 1_Analysis of microbial composition in different dry skin areas of Beijing women.docx by Jingtao Wang (828021)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>Analysis of physiological parameters showed that Hydration, TEWL and sebum secretion were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the lower leg compared to the back of the hand. …”
  16. 1616

    Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  17. 1617

    Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  18. 1618

    Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  19. 1619

    Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  20. 1620

    The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”