Search alternatives:
significantly between » significantly better (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
between increased » between treated (Expand Search), degree increased (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
significantly between » significantly better (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
between increased » between treated (Expand Search), degree increased (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Three-dimensional graphs showing the differences between the physical (m) and phylogenetic (Ma) axes for z-values that measure the significance of the NDD-influenced component or a...
Published 2021“…Note that levels of significance decrease smoothly with increasing focal-annular physical distance and irregularly with increasing focal-annular phylogenetic distance at each FDP. …”
-
4
-
5
<i>BZP4</i> expression differs significantly between genotypes.
Published 2023“…Genes with decreased expression are colored in orange and those with increased expression are colored in blue. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Differential expression of acute rejection markers between C1 and C2 clusters.
Published 2024Subjects: -
18
Connectivity between the left nucleus accumbens and two clusters.
Published 2025“…After intervention there was a significant decrease in the FR group (mean at V1: 0.249 ± 0.094, mean at V5: 0.130 ± 0.101, difference: −0.119 ± 0.097, p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the SM group (mean at V1: 0.156 ± 0.113, mean at V5: 0.287 ± 0.107, difference: 0.131 ± 0.066, p < 0.001). …”
-
19
-
20