Search alternatives:
significantly changed » significantly enhanced (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
changed degree » change degree (Expand Search)
significantly changed » significantly enhanced (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
changed degree » change degree (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
166
Plot showing the significant correlation between participant age and QOLI<sub>TOTDIFF</sub>.
Published 2022Subjects: -
167
-
168
-
169
Trend chart of coupling and coordination degree of rural development and governance.
Published 2024Subjects: -
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
1990–2020 bole PLEL area and change.
Published 2024“…Under the 2030 EED scenario, the overall changes in various types of land use are not significant, and the average value of landscape ecological risk is the smallest, but it is higher than that in 2020 as a whole; under EED scenario, the area of highly coordinated zone and moderate coordinated zone is the largest among four scenarios, and the best coupling coordination level among the four scenarios. …”
-
176
-
177
-
178
-
179
-
180