Search alternatives:
significantly cost » significantly across (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
cost decreased » costs decreased (Expand Search), costs increased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search)
significantly cost » significantly across (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
cost decreased » costs decreased (Expand Search), costs increased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
Costs and Benefits of Popular <i>P</i>‑Value Correction Methods in Three Models of Quantitative Omic Experiments
Published 2023“…No correction method can guarantee a low FDP in a single experiment, but the probability of a high FDP is small when a high number and proportion of corrected <i>p</i>-values are significant. On average, correction decreased sensitivity, but the sensitivity costs of BH and permutation were generally modest compared to the FDR benefits. …”
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
Percentage of US adults with health insurance coverage by income-level, age 60 to 70 years.
Published 2022Subjects: -
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
Test of standardized percentage bias across covariates before and after propensity score matching.
Published 2022Subjects: -
117
-
118
Test of propensity score distribution before and after propensity score matching.
Published 2022Subjects: -
119
-
120
Impact of the NEPHSP on the outpatient and inpatient expenditure after PSM.
Published 2022Subjects: